Talk:Earl Black (political scientist)
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Parkwells in topic Weak - Notability not proven
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Weak - Notability not proven edit
Just because he's written a couple of books does not make him notable. Very weak article that could easily be deleted. Needs secondary sources discussing the influence of his writing, if any.Parkwells (talk) 18:54, 6 August 2016 (UTC)