Talk:EMC VPLEX

Latest comment: 7 years ago by W Nowicki in topic Outdated?

Requested move edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 18:53, 19 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

VPLEXEMC VPLEX – To be consistent with other related articles, e.g. EMC NetWorker, EMC Symmetrix, EMC Isilon etc. Target does not exist but seems protected due to previous generations of promotional pages of that name. A better way to fix might be to reword to neutral language, not just give it name of the naked acronym. W Nowicki (talk) 21:39, 11 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Outdated? edit

I cleaned some mess and removed links to emc.com but article is still outdated. APS (Full Auto) (talk) 06:24, 26 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Not sure we need to remove all the primary sources, if that is what you meant. I would prefer to keep the sources where we can verify anything in the article. If anything, the large parts that are totally uncited should just be removed. I did a pass on it too. Thanks. W Nowicki (talk) 21:00, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Reply