Talk:Eén tegen 100

Latest comment: 13 years ago by 79.177.136.25 in topic Israeli mob-beater

Untitled edit

Uncancelled


But when did he start written it,and how long did it take how many hours,days,weeks,mouth,and how many years.THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR LISTEN TO ME!!!!

From a little old girl

Wrong 1/4 Million Dollar Answer edit

On tonights episide (Feb 09 07) a question was who had the most wives. Michael Jackson, Larry King, or King Henry the VIII. According to both of thier wikipedia entries and all sources I could find, both men had six wives. Of the 5 people left, 4 picked King Henry VIII. As near as I can tell, both answers were correct.

    • Yea that's what I've been wondering. What happens if the answer that the show gives is wrong? Does the lady get some kind of legal compensation?

When things like this happened on other games shows they just bring the people back for a other show.

      • According to Ken Jennings on his own web site, Larry King has been married seven times, though to six women, while Henry The Ocho was married six times. If I recall, the question related to number of marriages. DukeEGR93 04:33, 27 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Assistance: What happens if... edit

What happens to the two forms of unused assistance if towards the end of the game there is only one player left?

  • 1) "The number of "mob" player(s) who chose that answer is revealed" seems useless, that person is either right or wrong.
  • 2) "One mob member who answered correctly and one who answered incorrectly" that is impossible to happen. --Sirex98 04:40, 14 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
    • Good points. Actually, those can happen with more than one person. In the first help' case - what happens if no one picked the answer the contestant wants more information about? In the second case, what happens if (a) everyone picked the right answer or (b) no one picked the right answer? DukeEGR93 18:39, 14 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
    • On the Korean version of the program aired on 24 July 2007, the contestant was facing three mob members and asked for the "two answer" choice. It turns out that all three mob members all voted the same way. The host just said, "Sorry. Because they all voted the same way, you're out of luck," and the game continued. The contestant also had the choice of asking for the mob's popular answer, but was not allowed to use the choice since all three remaining mob members had chosen the same answer.Kkachi 02:38, 25 July 2007 (UTC)KkachiReply

{{Dubious}} tag edit

The article asserts that the next contestant is taken from the pool of 100. In the show that aired today, this didn't seem to happen. Can we get a clarification please? --Roninbk t c e # 05:15, 14 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

US Version edit

The US Version debutted on CNBC earlier in the week, not on NBC. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.91.28.133 (talkcontribs).72.91.28.133 (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Excuse me? Care to back up that assertion? I tend to think that the CNBC show definitely debuted after October 13 --RoninBKETC 03:24, 22 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
Doesn't CNBC air the encore?  — JT (TRAiNER4)  [T·C·E] 22:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

$3 million top prize? edit

Someone changed the article to say that the top prize is now $3 million. I checked the official site and it still said the top prize is $1 million, with no mention of an increased top prize anywhere. I'm changing it back for now; could someone try to check this one way or the other? --Poochy 02:57, 26 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

When the news came out that Kevin Federline was appearing as a Mob member on the show, it also mentioned that $3 million was up for grabs (Link to a story here). Interestingly, the top prize was said to be $3 million when the show was still in development. But nonetheless, your change back should be good until we find out one way or another in a week. --Scani 03:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
Okay, the $3 million top prize has been officially confirmed for the Dec. 1 episode, but I couldn't find any confirmation for subsequent episodes. --Poochy 01:20, 28 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
It's looking like a one-off for a single game from what I've seen, so I've edited the article as such. --Scani 20:48, 28 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Contestant in blue dress on 1/12 or 1/19 episode (USA on NBC)? edit

Does anyone know the name of this contestant? She was very lovely, had black hair, and wore a long blue dress. I know I have seen her somewhere else, but I can't remember where -- and it's driving me crazy! Thanks for the help! Aasdnnn02:42, 23 January 2007 (UTC)aasdnnn

Her name is Shelly Regan. On the show she said that she was a Miss Fitness champion. Kkachi (2 May 2007 12:42 UTC)

Bringing down article length? edit

I'm of the opinion that this article is getting lengthy - and some of the content isn't really necessary for the main article when it's already mentioned on the subarticles (especially for the American and Australian versions). I've started with a "General Format" section that should hopefully tie together all the commonalities of each. Each section can then be used to summarize host, prizes, rule variants, and so forth. --Scani 17:30, 11 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

  • I think perhaps the International Sections should be moved to it's own 'International' Page, and just leave a General Rules section up on the 1 vs. 100 entry Mwidjaja1 (talk) 02:10, 1 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Hmm... the only problem with this would be that not all the countries have a 'International' page (regarding 1 vs. 100). Unless you're planning on creating them? AlmightyClam 16:42, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Explanation edit

Okay, just to explain why I renamed the "American format" section "US Format." Personally, I beleive that "US Format" sounds more formal, more accurate (with Canada and Latin America technically being part of "America" etc. etc.) and generally better suited to a Wikipedia article. Hopefully there are no problems with this. AlmightyClam 16:38, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The result of the proposal was keep the articles as is (consensus). MuZemike (talk) 20:53, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I propose that 1 vs. 100 (Nintendo DS) and 1 vs. 100 (Xbox 360) be merged here. Neither articles are notable and only warrant a brief mention in the already-small "Video games" section of this article, which wouldn't even fill an entire section's worth of information. Please discuss below. If there is no response in five days of the sign date, then the proposal will automatically pass, and the articles will be merged. MuZemike (talk) 06:28, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oppose - This page is already long enough as it is IMO. And both of those pages were just created only two days ago, should give them time to expand first. I know the Xbox 360 one in particular will likely have a lot of information added over the coming months as it's a major part of the new system update and Xbox Live. SeanMooney (talk) 07:25, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oppose - they're seperate entities, and besides, there are tons of licensed video games that are seperate from their licenses (ie. The Office (video game), Surf's Up (video game)) - if you need 200 more titles, let me know. ;) JAF1970 (talk) 23:59, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oppose - I agree with SeanMooney in that this article is already long enough and then it would leave little space for the game section to expand. You have to give the articles time. Salavat (talk) 16:02, 25 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Soft Oppose I think the game articles should be merged together but are not relevant to this article. Lympathy Talk 13:52, 26 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
OK, before I close this discussion, would anyone be for merging the two video game articles into one separate article such as 1 vs. 100 (video games)? MuZemike (talk) 20:36, 26 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oppose. The 360 version is far different. In fact, it won't even be a retail game. It'll be an online service that requires no download. JAF1970 (talk) 00:53, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Is this settled? Just leave the articles the way they are. JAF1970 (talk) 21:27, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Interesting Blog edit

There is a series of twelve posts in this blog (http://tomthedog.blogspot.com/2006/11/1-vs-100.html) that follow the blogger's time auditioning for the show, and then being in the mob. The link is to the first post, but all 12 are easily reached through the sidebar. Cfrydj (talk) 17:09, 29 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Problems with Video Game section edit

There is an Xbox360/Xbox Live version of this game coming out May 8th (in Canada) but the mention of it in the Video Game section is very unclear and confusing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.13.66.30 (talk) 16:44, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Fixed, thank you. –xeno talk 04:25, 11 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

International Versions Error edit

Actually 100 Argentinos Dicen (Argentina) is a local version of Family Feud, not 1 vs 100, you can check it in here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_Feud_around_the_world —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.31.35.189 (talk) 13:11, 29 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Israeli mob-beater edit

One person, so far, has managed to beat the mob in the Israeli version, and won one million NIS. Could someone possibly edit the "List of people who beat the mob" and add this bit of information? Woozie 79.177.136.25 (talk) 19:26, 6 June 2010 (UTC)Reply