Talk:Dytiscidae

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Shyamal in topic Genus Cybister

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dytiscidae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:39, 15 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Genus Cybister edit

The genus Cybister is listed twice here. Once among the Cybistrinae and once among the Dytiscinae. The latter is a mistake, isn't it? --Turmfalke69 (talk) 17:44, 26 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

I think the entire phylogeny needs to be revisited, the subfamilies appear to be in flux and someone seems to have done a partial fix. For now, I have assumed that Cybistrinae is the valid subfamily. Shyamal (talk) 10:04, 27 May 2022 (UTC)Reply