Talk:Dysphania pusilla

A fact from Dysphania pusilla appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 October 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the pygmy goosefoot (pictured), a plant endemic to New Zealand that was thought to be extinct, was rediscovered in 2015?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dysphania pusilla.

Wikipedia

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

uses? edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

uses?--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 17:21, 2 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

I use full sentences when I ask a question. One of the benefits of doing so is that others understand what I'm asking. Schwede 66 18:36, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed correction (request expert confirmation) edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The text currently reads "The herb is distinguishable from other species (such as the introduced Cordyline pumilio)"

Yes, it certainly is distinguishable :). I wonder if that was intended to read "... such as the introduced Dysphania (or Chenopodium) pumilio".

Thank you for your notice. As a comparation with Cordyline makes no sense here, this is surely an error. I will change the text to Dysphania pumilio. Kind regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 11:33, 20 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic