Dynamoterror (final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 17 April 2022 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
I'm not sure what the consensus is on his Dynamoterror paper, but a significant degree of skepticism should be provided towards any of Chan-gyu Yun's work. He has done a lot of questionable actions which cause concern for his ethical and scientific reliability. His Teihivenator paper was published in a predatory journal and apparently plagiarized in part from Mickey Mortimer's blog,[1][2] and his affiliations list a fictional institution (“Vertebrate Paleontological Institute of Incheon”) to obscure the fact that he is an independent researcher. Fanboyphilosopher (talk) 16:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
