Talk:Dyfnwal ab Owain

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Paul S in topic Dyfnwal?

Dunmail, last king of Cumbria edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The result was not to merge into Dunmail. -- Mackem a1 13:36, 7 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure I'd merge the two for several reasons: - 1) Dunmail is as much a figure from legend as from history; and 2) There's no concrete evidence that the two are the same figure - and, indeed, the dates don't match. It may well be that a historical Dunmail was someone who made a grab for power in Cumbria, such usurpation serving as a pretext for Edmund's invasion. Theelf29 01:55, 4 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I agree with the above, and would not merge the articles. Dunmail is a figure of local legend who may or may not have a basis in historical fact. It may be that Domnall III is the historical basis for Dumnail, however this is conjectural. Unless and until a firm identification can be made between Dumnail and a historical figure, Domnall III or otherwise, then I would suggest that a separate entry for the Dumnail legend should remain.

Mackem a1 09:59, 7 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Dyfnwal? edit

Why has his name, which is recorded in Gaelic or as Dunguallon, been translated into modern Welsh for this article? Paul S (talk) 12:20, 18 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Probably because that's the form used in at least one of the primary sources, MacQuarrie's The Kings of Strathclyde.Cúchullain t/c 14:22, 18 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
When you say "Primary source" you don't mean to imply that Mr MacQuarrie was alive in the 10th Century...? Paul S (talk) 16:44, 18 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
Of course not. I mean it's one of the main sources used in the article.Cúchullain t/c 22:33, 18 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
The reason I ask is because all the other rulers of this region of this name are given the Old Welsh/Cumbric form Dumnagual whereas this one's name has the modern Welsh Dyfnwal. It seems sort of inconsistent. Paul S (talk) 21:11, 23 December 2012 (UTC)Reply