Talk:Dybbuk (ballet)

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Michael Bednarek in topic Cast lists

Cast lists edit

Apologies for not observing the customary way of displaying ballet casts. However, the current method of using a fairly wide empty first column seems rather ugly and creates a wide gap between the female & male cast (looking at it on a screen 1280 pixels wide). I can see two alternatives which I find prettier and more functional, keeping the columns closer toghether:


Original Patricia McBride Helgi Tomasson
  Tracey Bennett Bart Cook
      Victor Castelli
      Hermes Conde
2008 Spring:
Jerome Robbins celebration
Rachel Rutherford Benjamin Millepied
or

Original
Patricia McBrideHelgi Tomasson
Tracey BennettBart Cook
placeholder ———Victor Castelli
placeholder ———Hermes Conde
2008 SpringJerome Robbins celebration
Rachel RutherfordBenjamin Millepied

I prefer the second one. Comments? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 05:52, 27 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

columns edit

The reason for the empty first column is that many ballets, Western Symphony, Symphony in C and The Four Seasons for instance, have named movements that sit in column one. I've left it blank on ballets that don't have such names because there are lists of entire ballet seasons where some do and some don't, but all should line up (see List of New York City Ballet 2008 Spring repertory; see also List of Western Symphony casts.) In such lists the title of the ballet is also found in the leftmost column. — Robert Greer (talk) 20:10, 27 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

<shrug>Whatever</shrug> — to me, they all look ugly and have diminished functionality. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 06:35, 28 October 2009 (UTC), exits ballet stage.Reply