Talk:Dune (Klaus Schulze album)

==Fair use rationale for Image:Dune Klaus Schulze Album.jpg==

Untitled

Image:Dune Klaus Schulze Album.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:23, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

added --Cdl obelix (talk) 17:29, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

What about Dune? Any relation?

The cover art and tone of the Dune piece seems close enough to Frank Herbert's Dune. Is there any documented relationship between the two? It would be worth mentioning if so.--67.54.192.52 (talk) 22:27, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Cover art

The page claims that the cover is a picture from Solaris (and that is confirmed in this article at Sculze's official site ), but I've watched the movie recently and no such image appears anywhere in it. I'm confused - can anyone explain or confirm the source of the cover? Have I maybe watched a shortened version or Shulze edited the still he took? Phazd (talk) 21:27, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Dune (Klaus Schulze album)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

Start-Class criteria: Y An infobox. Y A lead section giving an overview of the album. Y A track listing. Y Reference to at least primary personnel by name. Y Categorisation at least by artist and year. B-Class criteria: Y All of Start class criteria. Y A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art. N At least one section of prose (in addition to the lead section). Y A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs. N A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians. N A casual reader should learn something about the album. C-Class criteria: N All of B-Class criteria. N A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details. N A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians. N No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources. N No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS. --Cdl obelix (talk) 16:41, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Last edited at 16:41, 23 August 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 13:54, 29 April 2016 (UTC)