Talk:Division of Bowman

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Division won by larger national 2pp 1954-2001 bar 1990 edit

Noteable? Would this be considered WP:OR? Timeshift (talk) 16:32, 19 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

A question about the 2007 election edit

How exactly were party preferences allocated during this election? The Greens normally allocate to Labor, which would have given Labor a victory based on numbers. 121.223.80.108 (talk) 05:33, 19 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

See here. 74 percent of people who voted or preferenced Green higher chose to preference Labor to 26 percent for Liberal. It's a few percent less than the national average. See instant runoff voting to understand how preferences are selected by the voter for the lower house, rather than "allocated" which is for "above the line" Senate voting. Timeshift (talk) 05:36, 19 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Division of Bowman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:18, 14 December 2016 (UTC)Reply