Talk:Displacement–length ratio
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Displacement–length ratio article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
The Displacement to Length ratio presented on this page comes from US Sailing (or similar national governing body) and is a reasonable method for comparing boats. However, look at Wikipedia’s Boating Encyclopedia and you see that Displacement can be different depending on which entity is using the word displacement. The actual literal definition of displacement is the actual weight at any given time divided by 64 (in salt water) since that will be the VOLUME of water that is displaced.
The intention of D/L is to be a unitless number, which is why the LWL (Length of the waterline) is cubed. So a “more true” definition of D/L would be
Weight in Pounds divided by 64 (in salt water) which would then be in cubic feet.
Divide that number by LWL cubed which would also be in cubic feet.
The reason that the National Governing Bodies typically add a factor is because the resulting calculation doing it the "literal" method will result in a very small fraction (typically less than .01). Folks just aren't used to dealing with fractions or decimals. Since the unitless number is just for comparison, it makes sense to "boost" the value into the hundreds.
- I get a factor of 28566.36600991 to convert the ratio based strictly on LWL, displacement, and seawater density to the value produced by the boosted formula. That seems weirdly arbitrary. Was it based on getting boats to average around 100, or something like that?--Tedd (talk) 06:50, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Displacement–length ratio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101127054902/http://sailingusa.info/design_winds.htm to http://www.sailingusa.info/design_winds.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:45, 13 December 2016 (UTC)