Talk:Disobedience (2017 film)

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Iwillnothurtyou in topic Unnecessary Link Removal

Copyright problem removed edit

  Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://gomoviesweb.com/disobedience-2017/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. NewYorkActuary (talk) 06:27, 14 April 2018 (UTC) NewYorkActuary (talk) 06:27, 14 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

This is a problem that as of this writing has been reverted 5 times: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.
If the stubborn disregard of Wikipedia policy continues, it may be best to restrict the article to registered users only. Trying to educate IP-only stubborn editors that don't give a damn is futile. The persistent ignoring of Wikipedia policy after it has been brought to attention within the article and in its history is verging on vandalism. Pyxis Solitary talk 05:57, 31 May 2018 (UTC); edited to include latest WP:COPYVIO. 06:22, 1 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Plot needs to be scaled-down edit

The article must comply with the Manual of Style/Film. WP:FILMPLOT specifically states:

Plot summaries for feature films should be between 400 and 700 words. The summary should not exceed the range unless the film's structure is unconventional.

Disobedience's narrative is neither complicated or nonlinear. As of this writing, the plot's wordage total is 999. It needs to be kept within the allowable range. Pyxis Solitary yak 02:18, 21 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Sources+links edit

The following are sources that have not been used in the article:

Extended content

Pyxis Solitary yak 11:28, 5 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Accolades table edit

There are plain, generic tables -- and there are enhanced tables used in film articles. Following is an enhanced awards table template that can be used when the film is nominated for awards:

Award Date of ceremony Category Recipient/nominee Result Ref
Name of organization
d/m/y
name of award Disobedience and/or names of nominated individuals {{Nom}} or {{Won}} source

Pyxis Solitary yak 12:55, 23 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Plot length, again edit

As mentioned above, the plot is far too long. In fact it was already too long before this edit in August last year added 3.5 Kb of content to it: So maybe a good start would be to revert to the version prior to this being made. I’ve added the 'Too long' template to make the objection more visible. Swanny18 (talk) 21:33, 10 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Unnecessary Link Removal edit

I added link for Rachel Weisz. Why was it removed? I'm new here, I mean as an editor. Please guide me and tell me if I did something wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iwillnothurtyou (talkcontribs) 00:10, 31 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Iwillnothurtyou, it looks like it was removed per MOS:REPEATLINK because she was already linked earlier in the infobox under the "Produced by" field. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 00:33, 31 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Okay, thanks. G.G.Hirve (talk) 00:38, 31 March 2022 (UTC)Reply