Talk:Dismemberment

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 8.48.251.116 in topic Macabre question

Definition in intro paragraph edit

"living" is not descriptive of the way it's sometimes been used in the press. For example:

Turkish officials allege Khashoggi was killed and then dismembered with a bone saw. [1]

Wrong Oms (talk) 21:43, 24 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

References


Macabre question edit

"The condemned's legs and arms would each be tied to the four animals separately, and then all four animals would be commanded or whipped to run in opposite directions, thereby literally 'tearing' the condemned's body in 5 pieces (two legs, two arms and the torso)"

Sorry to be picky, but this would result in 4 pieces, not 5. Three limbs would get ripped off, and the torso would remain attached to the final limb.

RedTomato (talk) 00:05, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

That's what I always thought. But since I've never witnessed such an execution, nor found a source that describes this kind of execution in enough detail, it'll probably remain something of a thought experiment. Anybody have an objection to changing the wording of the text? Boneyard90 (talk) 17:56, 30 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

People are sick. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.23.105.146 (talk) 08:53, 28 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

This is what happened to actual human beings (many of which were innocent). It is a part of our history. I mean, it isn't even close to being as bad as elaborate torture techniques intended to inflict excruciating pain on a person, sometimes lasting for several days. A lot of this stuff still happens in our world although not a whole lot of people know about it. I myself was quite taken aback when I first learned of these atrocities because my parents never thought me that these things were even possible, let alone actually happened to real humans and has been going on for 1000s of years. I really wonder why many parents decide not to teach their children about the realities of life when they ought to find most of this stuff on their own anyway. Not to mention the unlucky ones go through it, never knowing it was even possible for them to fall victim to these atrocities. 8.48.251.116 (talk) 18:24, 18 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Use as capital punishment edit

Dismemberment is still used as a capital punishment (albeit not very commonly) in at least Iran (http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1079325.html) and Saudi Arabia (http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/11/05/africa/ME-GEN-Saudi-Amputation.php) as per the Islamic sharia law. 139.179.137.70 (talk) 18:40, 6 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Drawn and quartered edit

Quartered yes, drawn no. See Hanged, drawn and quartered for two possible meanings of the word "drawn" neither of which refer to dismemberment. --Redrose64 (talk) 07:44, 14 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dismemberment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:46, 13 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dismemberment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:05, 11 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

BCE's into BC's, etc? edit

I reverted some unsigned editor's changes of date designations from BCE and CE to BC and AD. Those edits seemed gratuitous and unnecessary, and for no purpose other than the furthering of a personal agenda. Please initiate discussion here before making such changes. rowley (talk) 20:36, 11 September 2020 (UTC)Reply