Talk:Disability in China

Feedback

The fact that you divided the sections into subsections made the article much easier to read and comprehend! You might want to work on your intro a little bit: it is very interesting, but I found it a little hard to read, because there were so many numbers. You might want to have less statistics and more general information (like define disability?) in the intro and have the statistics in the article itself? Also, with that many numbers and statistics, would a chart maybe be something to consider to make the article more comprehensive? The chart you added into the Law section made it much clearer, so awesome job on that! The article does not seem biased to me and I think you're covering all or at least most of the key points relevant to the subject. Over all your article is easy to read, thanks to your good grammar and the awesome job you did proofreading the article, you get the message through well and the article is mostly efforless to read. I also like the fact that you provide so many links to oter article from yours.The images you added are relevant and positioned where they make sense. However I do think that more images would make the article even better. The article has very good sourcing for the most part. However, there are a couple places in the article (for example in the Language section) where the reader wonders where/which source the statement came from, and you might want to source it.AAla-Seppälä (talk) 23:57, 5 November 2014 (UTC)AAla-Seppälä

Peer revision

Your article looks really good. Your coverage of many aspects of disability makes the article feel complete and comprehensive. I was impressed with the changes to organization that you made. The article appears much more together with the new headings and subheadings. The chart was a great idea; it gives a nice overview of the laws associated with disability without being too dense. It was suggested that your introduction be more concise. I did not find it too difficult for readers, but it would be interesting to see all those numbers placed in a chart. Maybe a more general overview of disability, then a transition into disability in China. I like the section on Deng Pufang, but I wonder if it should be taken a bit further. It seems like that particular section is more about the shift toward disability services and equality. I would look for more information about how and/or why that shift happened outside of just Pufang's influence. Other than that, I would suggest proofreading, citation checks, and minor rewording; it just needs polishing. Ratilley (talk) 06:48, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

I have to disagree - this article must not include a "general overview of disability" - that's what the Disability article exists for. This is not a term paper, it's a Wikipedia article, expansive background, explanations and introductions are not included, they are wikilinked. A Wikipedia article must stick to it's defined subject - neither China, nor disability should be described or defined here. Only if this article uses a different meaning/scope of the terms "China" or "disability" than the respective articles, then the deviations from that article's definition/meaning/scope need to be explained. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:42, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Disability in China. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120618023551/http://www.cdpf.org.cn:80/clgk/content/2011-04/13/content_30318407.htm to http://www.cdpf.org.cn/clgk/content/2011-04/13/content_30318407.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. --Mirokado (talk) 19:29, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:07, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Disability in China. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20141013223328/http://www.cdpf.org.cn/english/contactus/content/2008-04/14/content_84989.htm to http://www.cdpf.org.cn/english/contactus/content/2008-04/14/content_84989.htm
• Added archive https://archive.is/20141013222826/http://www.cdpf.org.cn/english/lawsdoc/content/2008-04/10/content_84888.htm to http://www.cdpf.org.cn/english/lawsdoc/content/2008-04/10/content_84888.htm
• Added archive https://archive.is/20141125145635/http://www.cdpf.org.cn/english/statistics/content/2008-04/10/content_84890.htm to http://www.cdpf.org.cn/english/statistics/content/2008-04/10/content_84890.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cdpf.org.cn/clgk/content/2011-04/13/content_30318407.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110520115453/http://www.cdpf.org.cn/english/contactus/content/2008-04/14/content_84987.htm to http://www.cdpf.org.cn/english/contactus/content/2008-04/14/content_84987.htm
• Added archive https://archive.is/20141013211641/http://www.cdpf.org.cn/english/leadership/leadership.htm to http://www.cdpf.org.cn/english/leadership/leadership.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:32, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Intro

What do you mean it’s “common in China”? What does that mean? Hwfr (talk) 16:16, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Rice University supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2014 Fall term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 17:24, 2 January 2023 (UTC)