Talk:Dir District
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Pakistan may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Copyright problem removed edit
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.khyber.org/places/2005/TheStateofDir.shtml. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. --Misarxist 11:22, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Comments on deplorable state of access roads edit
Unfortunately, I decided I had to remove this sentemce, which intro'ed the tourist places in lower Dir:
In reality, the entire Dir region is a wonder of creation but to high authorities negligence and lack of communication roads, most of the areas are clouded in the mystery of infamy but still few areas which are recently developed includes;
It is just such a nicely-crafted sentence, I wish it could have stayed, but sadly, it's not very encyclopaedic in tone, so I have replaced it with a bland, anodyne intro sentence. Oh well! 49.177.6.159 (talk) 07:31, 18 September 2021 (UTC)