Talk:Dio Wang
Latest comment: 10 years ago by The Drover's Wife in topic Should the article be sent to AfD?
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dio Wang article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Should the article be sent to AfD?
editShould the article be sent to AfD? Timeshift (talk) 19:53, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- As I said at the Australian politics WikiProject, I think having articles on Wang (and Dropulich) is pretty important to Wikipedia having a good coverage of the 2013 election fiasco in WA. There is more than enough sources on both of them to pass the generic notability guidelines without much hassle, and I feel it enhances our coverage quite a lot for readers to actually be able to read about the people who were initially declared elected. The Drover's Wife (talk) 07:47, 23 February 2014 (UTC)