This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion
This article is about two regulation proposals: the Digital Services Act (DSA) and the Digital Market act (DMA) and therefore it should be renamed "Digital package" and have two sections, one for each regulation proposal. See the general press release here, and the details about the DSA here and the DMA here. Etienneperrin (talk) 22:15, 15 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Should be two separate articles then? DMA article on Wikipedia doesn't exist today.--LS (talk) 10:39, 18 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Agree for 2 separate articles. The 2 regulations with different purposes. Already 2 items on wikidata. LaMèreVeille (talk) 04:28, 19 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Indeed, I believe the right thing to do would be to keep the DSA article up as is. Then, in future, potentially having a standalone DMA article as well (having two separate articles). Regardless, I believe the DSA article should stay up independently. James Tamim (talk) 21:16, 20 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Who gets to decide what is (a) illegal content, (b) transparent advertising and (c) disinformation? For instance, lets say a Twitter reports on some nefarious activity by some quasi-independent state agency engaged in manipulating social media posts. The said agency could declare such reports disinformation or illegal content. In short the DSA could become an instrument of censorship. Cases in point being the ‘Twitter Files’ and the Biden Laptop. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.26.217.104 (talk) 22:07, 7 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
A court would decide, and it is not appropriate to 'clarify' these terms on Wikipedia, as they are only as clear as you stated and they will only become more clear after they are tested in court. Vonkelonkel (talk) 01:30, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Where are all the critiques of this law listed? The fear of new steps towards totalitarian centralism and similar ideas? 2A01:598:D008:928B:CAD:E569:9053:A150 (talk) 21:37, 25 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
There are more than enough critiques listed under the Reactions section. Vonkelonkel (talk) 00:21, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
