Talk:Digital Playground

Digital Playground Blogs

Several Digital Playground performers are now blogging on XCritic. Please consider these for inclusion:

Stoya Adrianna Lynn Shay Jordan

also there is an extensive audio interview with Stoya http://www.xcritic.com/columns/column.php?columnID=259 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gkleinman (talk • contribs) 22:04, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Pirates

shouldnt the information on the movie "PIRATES" be considered/split into a seperate article? (considering how "big" the film is - in terms of awards etc.)

Their Site: http://www.piratesxxx.com/main.php

Review: http://www.rogreviews.com/reviews/read_review.asp?sku=3748 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.51.209.254 (talk • contribs) 09:21, April 4, 2006

• If this film were "big" in terms of importance, yes. I see no evidence presented that it is. What little is written here about the film is entirely self-promotional. Valrith 18:37, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

• Both you, I, and others have edited the part referring to this film. If this is self promotional, does this mean you and I are involved with the film? I certainly don't remember making this film, did you? You "see no evidence presented" that this is a big film, could that be because you don't read it? Because it is there! Read the first link directly above you, as it said in this wikipedia article referring to it: "RogReviews called it "the most talked about adult movie of the year"" Mathmo ^Talk 00:26, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

That photograph

In the photograph for this article, the girl second from the right looks nothing like Kayden Kross. Is it her? If so, she looks ten years younger. Did she have some work done? If she did then that information should be included. Certainly it does not look like Kayden at all.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Digital Playground. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090328140414/http://tvnz.co.nz/view/page/411423/646884 to http://tvnz.co.nz/view/page/411423/646884
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120131025101/http://xbizawards.xbiz.com/nominees.php to http://xbizawards.xbiz.com/nominees.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071020212409/http://www.avnawards.com/index.php?content=pastwinners to http://www.avnawards.com/index.php?content=pastwinners
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090228062450/http://business.avn.com/articles/2759.html to http://business.avn.com/articles/2759.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090305071639/http://www.avnawards.com/index.php?content=winners09 to http://www.avnawards.com/index.php?content=winners09

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:17, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Xxnx

Sexy 119.160.69.137 (talk) 20:14, 11 June 2022 (UTC)