Talk:Digimon Racing/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Against Criteria

1. PASS

A) Pass

B) Pass

2. (FAILED 2B) PASS!

A) Pass

B) FAIL. Please source the introduction. Sources are on the bottom, but the information in the intro is not sourced.

Stuff in the intro should not be sourced unless it contains specific quotes that have to be attributed. Tezero (talk) 21:28, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

(b) it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; (emphasis added) This fails the bolded part Hamtechperson 03:13, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

What statistics, or really anything in the intro, are likely to be challenged? Tezero (talk) 21:20, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

When I changed the info there, you reverted based on a source. The portion attributed to the source was contradictory. Also, see WP:OWN. You look to me like you are OWNing the article. Hamtechperson 13:24, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

How is it contradictory? Your comment about ownership concerns me. Perhaps it seems that I am overly defensive of a small group of sources, but it's because the article has a fairly limited subject matter; therefore, there aren't too many reliable sources out there for me to use. I'll add the source to the intro if you want. Tezero (talk) 01:38, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

I'd appreciate that. The operative word in my last comment was WAS. Sorry about the (now stricken) OWNership comment. Hamtechperson 17:21, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Passed by decision of reviewer at 01:53, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

C) Pass

3. PASS

A) Pass

B) Pass

4. Pass

5. Pass

6. PASS

A) Pass

B) Pass

Reviewer: Hamtechperson 02:48, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Comments by Other Users

It would be helpful to restate the questions here rather than an outline with just PASS/FAIL; that way I don't have to keep flipping between the criteria and the assessment. --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 03:00, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

So was this passed and just not listed as such, or are we still waiting for the sourcing? --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib)

I did the sourcing thing. I thought it was listed as passed. Maybe he forgot to remove it. I'll check GAN. Tezero (talk) 03:48, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Nevermind, everything looks fine. --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 09:51, 13 April 2010 (UTC)