Talk:Diana Ross (1970 album)

Fair use rationale for Image:Dianasolo.jpg

Image:Dianasolo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:27, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Dianasolo.jpg

Image:Dianasolo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Cover photo

Was that photo contemporaneous ? She looks very thin. -- Beardo (talk) 17:28, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

I actually just came here to comment on the cover photo. Was there some thinking behind it? None of the reviews seem to mention it but it seems a very odd picture to use. She looks like a little boy and yes, extremely thin. Anyone know of any story behind it?--Tuzapicabit (talk) 07:01, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

• • The days before photoshop and shit. Just her natural body. This cover has always irked me but I think I finally know the reason behind the shock value. She is wearing male clothing for whatever reason. Her legs are just very muscular that's all and she has small arms with her bob haircut that makes her look kinda boyish, but this was popular at the time. She was also young during this time and she has always been the free spirited type if you seen Mahogany. Boaxy (talk) 09:00, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

She was 26 - I raised the question because I thought she looked younger in the photo. Some others from the same session here - https://jazzinphoto.wordpress.com/2013/10/20/diana-ross-diana-ross-1970/ - which don't look so extreme. I still think there must be some story behind its use.

Also, I see the main article on her mentions problems with anorexia. -- Beardo (talk) 04:36, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

The photo was to be both the anthesis and an anathema of what Diana Ross had previous been known for. It showed how ordinary she was in a realistic way and not the purported, unrealistic depiction of prior years. She was 26 in 1970; today she is 79. When you take off the theatrical makeup, costumes, wigs, jewelry and other such accoutrements, she is an old female who is aging...accordingly. She wasn't born Supreme and if she lives long enough, she might die gracefully and honorable but hardly Supreme. Look at Dave Clark, Betula Clark, Paul McCartney, Ringo Starr, Elton John, Mick agger and Barbara Streisand, they are all of the same generations and look it, too! Fame and Fortune are incidental to reality. Spenser - The Unknown (talk) 22:51, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Diana Ross (1970 album)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

Article requirements for Start-Class criteria: Y An infobox. Y A lead section giving an overview of the album. Y A track listing. Y Reference to at least primary personnel by name. Y Categorisation at least by artist and year. B-Class criteria: Y All of Start class criteria. Y A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art. N At least one section of prose (in addition to the lead section). Y A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs. N A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians. N A casual reader should learn something about the album. C-Class criteria: N All of B-Class criteria. N A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details. N A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians. N No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources. N No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS. Cdl obelix (talk) 10:54, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Last edited at 10:54, 4 July 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 13:21, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Album Cover Section Wordpress Reference

If this still manages to break the rules against wordpress blogs, please feel free to delete the reference, but the link is an interview between the blog owner (who is not me and I am not associated with) and the photographer who took the photo. The information I included is fairly brief and non-controversial. ShadyBanana (talk) 10:15, 30 January 2023 (UTC)