Talk:Diana DeGette/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Gun control
gun control it states "she supports the second amendment" when it needs to read "she claims to support the second amendment." By any objective standard she does NOT support the Second Amendment. If I were a congressman and I claimed to support civil rights, but then I introduced bills allowing torture and indefinite detention, any objective person would conclude I did not actually support civil rights but merely claimed to support them. She has a 0% ranking from the two largest pro-2nd Amendment groups in the USA and she has a record of introducing bills to ban millions of firearms. By no objective standard does she support the second amendment. The section on her and gun control is best written "she claims to support" and leaving it up to the reader to decide if her claims are valid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.140.85.63 (talk) 06:25, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
This page is being white washed continuously to remove any reference to her 2013 statements in regards to firearm magazines. Not acceptable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whubbard (talk • contribs) 22:48, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
no mention
her sister Cara is a reporter journalist - leave that fact out how news is skewed75.163.213.156 (talk) 14:01, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Non-neutral language
Edited unsupported and clearly non-neutral statement "Although not knowing how magazines work" as well as "DeGette believes". The use of this language was designed to impart an anti-gun bias to the reader. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgroub (talk • contribs) 15:29, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Diana DeGette. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080318064223/http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=4370 to http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=4370
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:14, 11 December 2017 (UTC)