Talk:Diamictite

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Diamictite is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Hi, the description of "diamictite" given in this article resembles very closely that of a tillite. Are these terms used synonymous? In the european tradition a diamictite is rather defined by it's texture (structure), than by it's origin (like tillite is). Therefore the term diamictite may be used, when a rock looks very much like a tillite, but when it's origin is not quiet clear, or actually may very likely be different (pseudotillite), like some volcanic rocks deposited during a lahar. Greetings Geoz 21:49, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Diamict/Diamictite edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

My understanding is that the term diamictite should refer only to lithified matrix-supported sediment (of whatever origin), and that the term "diamict" should refer to unlithified sediments with these characteristics. So I think the first image from Stolpe, Germany should be a diamict, and the other two images in the article are diamictites. Any comments?Jstuby (talk) 17:11, 11 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

You are correct. The term diamictite is used for lithified, matrix-supported sediments. The term diamict is used for unlithified matrix-supported sediments. I have corrected the caption to reflect this distinction.Paul H. (talk) 12:04, 8 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Diamictite. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071128105306/http://courses.eas.ualberta.ca/eas457/Eyles_2004.pdf to http://courses.eas.ualberta.ca/eas457/Eyles_2004.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:39, 10 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic