Talk:Dhananjoy Chatterjee

Untitled

If Dhanajoy Chatterjee was 41 years old at the time of his execution in August 14 2004, that would mean he was born in 1963. Being born in 1965 would make him 39 years old.Aishah Bowron,15:45, 22 March 2006

But unless I just can't see it, the article doesn't say he was 41. Those references which mention his age, e.g. Indolink, and MSNBC, say he was 39. -- Arwel (talk) 16:33, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

The victim is 18 years old. It is wrongly mentioned as 14 years in the article. Refer the judgment here.http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1351933/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.227.30.129 (talk) 06:24, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Discrepancies

There are discrepancies between the court order available at India Kanoon website and this article, include about age. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 19:37, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Also the tone of the article is un-encyclopaedic like a case is being argued. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 19:38, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

@Yogesh Khandke:-- Done--Massively edited.Winged Blades ^Godric 09:30, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

External links

14 is far too many "External links" and needs to be trimmed down. Otr500 (talk) 00:51, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

@Otr500:-- Done--Massively edited.Winged Blades ^Godric 09:30, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

WOW! I would state "Massively edited" is an understatement. While I did not dig into the edits there apparently was an extremely large amount of "too much". It goes to show that an article can be inundated with references and images, with heavy bias towards "The innocence of Dhananjoy Chatterjee", that leaves it begging for a neutrality tag. This was especially noticeable beginning with the section Was Dhananjoy framed?, that had sub-sections containing the word "Dubious", and the Miscarriage of justice section that surely contained original research, so thanks on that part.

There was content, "A book Hangwoman authored by KR Meera was inspired from Dhananjoy hanging.", and a reference (http://indianexpress.com/article/lifestyle/books/the-executioners-song/%7Ctitle=Book review: KR Meera borrows liberally from the mystique of the Dhananjoy hanging in Hangwoman), that seemed to be interesting but I didn't look at relevance. Otr500 (talk) 08:25, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

@Otr500:--Thanks!I would like to develop the article as I get more time!Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 10:17, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Dhananjoy Chatterjee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150217191504/https://www.amnesty.org/ar/library/asset/ASA20/039/1991/es/400235c5-f941-11dd-92e7-c59f81373cf2/asa200391991en.pdf to https://www.amnesty.org/ar/library/asset/ASA20/039/1991/es/400235c5-f941-11dd-92e7-c59f81373cf2/asa200391991en.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040825205612/http://www.deccanherald.com/deccanherald/aug112004/i4.asp to http://www.deccanherald.com/deccanherald/aug112004/i4.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040930113654/http://www.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=35020 to http://www.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=35020

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:45, 9 September 2017 (UTC)