A fact from Devotional articles appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 February 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Christianty symbols are sometimes of course also replaced, so firms can survive.
Is an economically uninteresting thing such as a birdpart... Mineral also part of Devotional articles article?
No football-god products, please. Mala instead ?Brombäre (talk) 14:03, 23 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Removed the sentence "In other cases, devotional objects might have mixed symbols of different religion, for example popularizing and entrenching pagan elements in Christianity, resulting in objects such images of Black Madonna.[1]" because the cited source does not say what this sentence does. The source says
"Cult statues and icons of the Virgin and the saints are also essentially ‘popular’ images and may in some cases have perpetuated pagan and folklore imagery." and then follows the next sentence, "Images of the ‘Black Virgin’, often considered indicative of some primitive devotion, can probably be explained in terms of the respect for an old image that could not be touched." Nefaeryous (talk) 03:17, 15 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
^Cite error: The named reference Hourihane2012 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
