A fact from Devi Upanishad appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 November 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the Devi Upanishad reveres Devi(pictured), the Hindu goddess, as the highest principle and ultimate truth in the universe?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Devi stuti and iconography - Vedas,Rudras,Adityas,Soma,Prajapati, Indra
Removed.
@Sainsf: I also removed all cites from the lead, something that required moving some text and all sources to the main article. So you will see two new sections Etymology and History. @Nvvchar: Please double check my edits and if I missed anything or duplinks, please fix. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 17:36, 3 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Sainsf: The lead and the text have been slightly reorganized in view of shiting of refrences from the lead. Other wise all review issue have been addressed.Nvvchar. 01:04, 4 February 2016 (UTC)Reply