Talk:Deniliquin railway station
Latest comment: 6 months ago by GMH Melbourne in topic Comments from AfC Draft
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Deniliquin railway station article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Comments from AfC Draft edit
Moved from Draft:Deniliquin railway station
Comment: Oh and it might help if you could go into more depth about the station's fire. Fork99 (talk) 14:50, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: I still have doubts on whether the article has enough information to demonstrate notability as its own separate topic distinct from the railway line it's located on. While I don't have enough outside information/knowledge to doubt the station's notability, I doubt the article's ability to demonstrate this. I found a physical book that might help with your research and citations. You might be able to find other similar books on railway stations, buildings and their architecture. If no remnants remain from the station, are there any other features that demonstrate its notability? There's still a few manual of style issues, such as wording, spelling mistakes and grammar. Australian English should also be used per WP:ENGVAR; I noticed “unrecognizable”. “Deniliquin Line” should be “Deniliquin railway line”, and “for the town of” should be “located in the town of”. Following other examples of Australian stations, there’s should not be a leading ‘The’ in the lead, and “Railway Station” should be “railway station”. I would try to emulate the style and depth of major regional railway stations in Australia, maybe have a look at Albury railway station. For any future reviewers, please merge any relevant information into Deniliquin railway line if this draft is declined. Fork99 (talk) 14:42, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Insufficient sourcing, and most of the article's text isn't even about the station. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 13:06, 13 August 2023 (UTC)