Talk:Deborah Eisenberg
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Awards and criticism edit
I see the awards, but I don't see anything related to criticism? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.40.82.109 (talk) 23:12, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Charlie Hebdo and PEN edit
Eisenberg has certainly been outspoken on regard to the PEN award to Charlie Hebdo through a published letter she wrote, and I think that this may warrant some coverage. However, at the moment we spend more time, through extensive quotes, on this one issue than we do on her biography and our account of her writing. This reads like undue emphasis on a single event. I'd like to remove the quotes, and trim it back to a statement along the lines that she had been controversially outspoken against Charlie Hebdo being given an award. While the quotes do provide context, a link to the letter would allow a reader to gain that without placing undue weight on this controversy. - Bilby (talk) 23:24, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:22, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
