Talk:Death Certificate (album)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Fair use rationale for Image:Ice Cube-Death Certificate (album cover).jpg edit

 

Image:Ice Cube-Death Certificate (album cover).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

  Done - chiefly per WP:PRECISION, but also per naming conventions on other Ice Cube albums (eg Lethal Injection (album)). Neil  09:10, 25 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Requested move edit

Death CertificateDeath Certificate (album) to avoid confusion with death certificate

WP:PRECISION recommends "adding a parethical (bracketed) disambiguator to the page name: for instance when both spellings are often or easily confused." And, despite the differences in article length, death certificate is the primary topic after recentism and geographical bias are accounted for. — AjaxSmack 08:13, 18 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Survey edit

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
  • Support - Per WP:PRECISION. --Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor 22:36, 18 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • Support -Ulla 06:14, 20 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose. No conflict exists or is anticipated. Unnecessary disambiguation. WP:ALBUM says pretty explicitly, The article name should be the title of the album, disambiguated if necessary. Do not pre-emptively disambiguate! / edg 06:20, 20 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • Support, textbook example of WP:PRECISION (and basically repeated in similar cases, like WP:NCF, and WP:NCTV) Duja 09:57, 20 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per nom. Disambiguating by capitalization is a bad idea, and will inevitably lead to confusion. PC78 10:35, 20 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose . Just as Edgarde says, no conflict exists. The dab links on both pages is sufficent enough. Admc2006 16:57, 20 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Discussion edit

I generally agree that disambiguation by capitalization isn't enough in this case, but it does raise the question of where the redirect should point after the move. -GTBacchus(talk) 02:31, 25 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I don't see why capitalization is not sufficient. Who would capitalize this term unnecessarily, and how much trouble is it really for them to click the redirect? Retitling this article to Death Certificate (album) only adds an inconvenience to people searching for this album. Does Death certificate likewise need to be changed to Death Certificate (document)? / edg 02:41, 25 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Bot report : Found duplicate references ! edit

In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :)

  • "RCC" :
    • {{cite web | last = | first = | url = http://www.rockrap.com/archive/archiv94.html | title = Rock & Rap Archives: Number 94/January 1992 | format = | work = | publisher = | accessdate ughlummtmuoipjmrtipjutjijioojooujoiyukoykdkokodkoid= June 8 | accessyear = 2007}}
    • {{cite web | last = | first = | url = http://www.rockrap.com/archive/archiv94.html | title = Rock & Rap Archives: Number 94/January 1992 | format = | work = | publisher = | accessdate = June 8 | accessyear = 2007}}

DumZiBoT (talk) 22:57, 10 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Death Certificate (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:07, 9 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Death Certificate (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:59, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply