Talk:Dealbreakers Talk Show No. 0001/GA1
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: BelovedFreak 20:38, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- No major problems, gave it a copyedit.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- No problems, all seem reliable. About.com ref is an interview.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Covers all major points, can't see any obvious critical analysis etc. missed.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- No problems
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- no problems
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Appropriate use and licenses.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Good job.
- Pass/Fail:
Ok, I've done a bit of a copyedit, as usual, check that it's all acceptable! Now, I've also cut some detail out of the production section which I don't feel is necessary here (recapping of previous episodes). It's not a dealbreaker (excuse the pun!), so if you're attached to those bits, feel free to re-add them. I didn't think they were really necessary to understanding this episode. Also, some of the bits about the plot for this episode, don't need to be repeated in production, as I think we can assume the reader has read that bit first. Anyway, as I say, it's just my personal opinion, not GA requirements, so feel free to change it back!
One thing I've wondered about before, but forgot until now, is you use of "fictional" when talking about TGS. I'm not sure it's necessary, because the whole thing is fictional, but within the universe of 30 Rock, TGS is a real show, right? Does that make sense? Anyway, I'll leave that up to you to change if you agree. I'm happy to list this as a good article, so well done!--BelovedFreak 21:07, 25 July 2010 (UTC)