Talk:David Haugh

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Jrgilb in topic Untitled



Untitled

edit

The "source" for anti-Notre Dame "bias" is not credible, and it does not support the sentence that I have removed. This "source" is a single opinion column written by an apologist for Notre Dame who criticized and smeared Haugh for his criticism of Notre Dame's conduct in its recent handling of an allegation of sexual assault against a Notre Dame football player and subsequent suicide by the alleged victim. To support the sentence as written, the contributor would need to provide multiple credible sources. Jrgilb (talk) 05:01, 1 February 2011 (UTC)Reply