Talk:David Gray (snooker player)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Group stage edit

The "group stage" overly-detailed explanation which I pruned, should actually probably be explained in even more detail at the Snooker world rankings article's discussion of the tournaments. The information is valuable, but doesn't belong in that much detail in a player bio. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 00:50, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I tried to clarify the "group stage" thing in brief, it was a round robin experiment that was never used thereafter; but I can't see any reason to put this definition in full into the Snooker world rankings article as this was unique to this one tournament.
Also, isn't the "session to spare" expression self-explanatory? It's used a lot in snooker commentary
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.63.116.72 (talkcontribs) 08:17, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
Point 1: Fair enough; the article about that season or this tournament should go into it though, because it was unusual. I.e., it does need to be documented at Wikpedia somewhere, but not in great depth in a player bio. Point 2: I've been editing these articles for 2 years, and I play snooker, a little (pool mostly), but that phrase means nothing to me at all, ergo it probably won't mean anything to most readers, only to already-knowledgeable hardcore snooker fans, who are not WP's principal audience. I think it is a Briticism, or rather a WPBSAism. The BCA's defintion of snooker (which is of course only definitive in the US and perhaps explanatory in a sense of why there have never been any US snooker world champ contenders, versus Canadian ones who follow the WPBSA rules...) Anyway the point is it needs some kind of explication, and this might be best done at WP:CUEGLOSS, handled here with a "{{Cuegloss|Session|session}}" link.
OK good point, I never thought of that, I've put a definition of "session (snooker)" and "session to spare" onto WP:CUEGLOSS, the latter of which I have included in the definition that this expression is generally used in Britain but not internationally.
As for the round robin tournament, perhaps a the same as you suggested with "session" (i.e., a Cuegloss link?) referring to the 2006-2007 season or the 2006 Grand Prix if any such articles do presently exist?
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.63.116.72 (talkcontribs) 12:30, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the Cuegloss addition; will check and make sure it is in the article in a moment. For round-robin, that concept already has its own article, and I think we are now linking to it. What I meant above was that the unusual nature of this particular tournment should be documented somewhere (somewhere other than a bio article, such as an article about that particular tournament series, or about the ranking tournaments system in general. It's not really a "term" per se, so it's not a good WP:CUEGLOSS addition. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 23:34, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
BTW, have got your mesage and apologise for removing the clarify flags, but I thought I had clarified the matter, otherwise I would not have done so
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.15.23.246 (talkcontribs) 18:39, 6 August 2007
Noted; I'll remove the warning code since your edits were in good faith. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 23:34, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
Are User:82.15.23.246 and User:194.63.116.72 the same person? I'm having trouble remembering who I'm talking to about what. It would be grand if you (both?) registered a real user account, and joined WP:SNOOKER (see WP:SNOOKER#Particpants). — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 23:34, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've now registered as a user in my own right - the reason I had two usernames coming up before I registered was because I editted the articles from two different PCs! (D-Weaving 13:19, 07 August 2007 (UTC))

Related requested move edit

Talk:David Gray (musician) In ictu oculi (talk) 09:19, 24 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David Gray (snooker player). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:54, 5 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David Gray (snooker player). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:55, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply