Talk:David Blanchflower

Learn more about this page

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Dartmouth Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire - Dartmouth College (assessed as Low-importance).

Economics

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

David Blanchflower was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 5, 2006	Good article nominee	Listed
June 7, 2009	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

His own divorce edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

I don't know how much personal detail should be added to these bio articles but would a reference to his own acrimonious divorce be appropriate? It certainly has some relevance and also some "irony" value considering (according to the wiki page) "He has been labelled a "happiness guru" for his ability to quantify the increase in happiness for individuals who are married or have sex frequently, work which has applications in divorce law". External link here: [1]

What do other wikipedians think? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tickerhacker (talk • contribs) 11:29, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I agree with you. I think earlier editions of this wiki entry has an entry about his divorce court case Blanchflower v. Blanchflower, but then there were a bit too much (salacious?) details which may detract readers from Blanchflower's contributions to economics. They were divorcing because his wife left him for another woman. I guess given the circumstances his claim that married people are happier isn't really that ironic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pelikan4001 (talk • contribs) 13:43, 2 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

I think it should be included, in a neutral/aside kind of manner. After all the divorce case Blanchflower v. Blanchflower does link back to here. Bikerprof (talk) 18:18, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I included it in this article as a See also section minutes ago. Like I stated in that edit summary, it's ridiculous that any mention of it has been excluded from this article. I would state that Blanchflower, who apparently edited this article in 2012 as Blanchflower (talk · contribs), removed the material. But his contributions don't show that he has repeatedly removed the material....at least not under that registered account. Flyer22 (talk) 01:53, 10 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

This IP keeps removing the see also link, and I keep reverting the IP. Flyer22 (talk) 14:28, 22 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Blanchflowerthewagecurve.jpg edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image:Blanchflowerthewagecurve.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:07, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

GA reassessment edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

After reviewing this article, I am going to have to delist this article for the following reasons:

The education section in unreferenced.
The Monetary Policy Committee section needs updating.
There's very little information on his life, and the article doesn't seem to have a feeling of completeness.

Upon this stuff being fixed, it can be renominated at GAN. Wizardman 23:17, 7 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Phillips curve confusion edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The section on the Phillips curve does not in any way make clear what Blanchflower's disagreement with the curve is --- his "re-defined" curve sounds (to a layman, at any rate) identical to the curve described in the Phillips curve article! 91.106.172.248 (talk) 12:29, 12 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Danny! edit

Latest comment: 2 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This poor man is CONSTANTLY being referred to as Danny Blanchflower in the UK media, confusing his name with that of the legendary footballer. Sarah Montague on Radio 4 just now called him this to his face. I think he's probably given up correcting people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.72.224.186 (talk) 07:53, 24 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

His chosen nickname is Danny. See his own X (formerly Twitter) profile: https://twitter.com/D_Blanchflower EditorAtLarge1976 (talk) 14:26, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on David Blanchflower. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:58, 5 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic