| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Judicial opinions edit
For someone who has been a judge less than 12 months, the section on his judicial opinions already appears to me to be excessively detailed and this will only get worse if the same type of editing continues. JamG, an encyclopedia article is meant to be a summary of the most notable things about a person's life, not a step by step recording of everything they do. Can you please consider summarising this more succinctly and in the future refrain from adding each new case he decides? Thanks, Melcous (talk) 22:00, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your helpful guidance. JamG (talk) 23:41, 26 May 2018 (UTC)