This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
He cut off some girls hair? Is this the best the Early Life section has to offer? I mean, how low can Wikipedia fall? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.9.226.255 (talk) 21:28, 21 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Good point. The sole source is a smear piece from a sneering, London-based "serious" newspaper that parades its right-on and politically-correct credentials when it suits them, but is quite happy to go with third rate bigoted 1970s working men's club comedy innuendo about "special schools" and somebody's lack of a sexual relationship if they think it makes a good story. They don't quite go as far as sticking their tongue in their lower lip and going "gunnnnrrrh!", but that's clearly the overall tone they're aiming for. 217.155.20.163 (talk) 00:38, 2 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
I agree, it wasn't a particularly good source and maybe it was partly trivia; maybe when I added the reference I should have removed that, as well as the unverifiable nonsense I did remove, although I had less understanding of Wikipedia's policies (particularly about sources and undue weight) at the time. I've redirected the article; he seems to be only notable as a member of the band, so unless the main article becomes too long, a separate article probably isn't needed. snigbrook (talk) 21:46, 24 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
