Talk:Dave Aronberg

Trafficking charges

@XavierItzm: What are you trying to say in your edit comments. No one ever has been convicted of sex trafficking? No one was convicted of sex trafficking as a result of this task force(how it reads in your version). Or no one was convicted as a result of the day-spa sting operation done by the task force. All I have done is mention that those comments ONLY refer to that sting operation which yes was on multiple places over a period of time. But the way it was worded doesn't mention that. It just say he formed task force, was appointed, and no charges were ever made. This is false. So either reword it so it is accurate or I will. Please see:

• [1] And while the day-spa investigation has not led to a single human-trafficking arrest, the task force has been credited with 30 arrests and 12 convictions related to the offense — the use of force, fraud or coercion to lure victims and then exploit them for sex acts or labor.
• [2] U.S. Attorney Fajardo Orshan commended the investigation efforts of the FBI, PBSO, and the Palm Beach County Human Trafficking Task Force in this matter. Mrs. Fajardo Orshan thanked Palm Beach County State Attorney Dave Aronberg for the 15th Judicial Circuit and his staff for their assistance with this investigation.
• [3] At least 10 people have been arrested on human trafficking charges in Palm Beach County this year, including four in three separate cases last week. Palm Beach County State Attorney Dave Aronberg credits a 10-member task force formed in January for the growing number of arrests for an offense some have called modern-day slavery.

You are ignoring the fact that the source are referring to just the day/spa operation. This was one operation 4 years ago. There were many other that year that resulted in convictions, there have been more since. This is all easy to find information. WikiVirusC^(talk) 15:16, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Dude, you need to cool off. Look at the very first source you cited: "the day-spa investigation has not led to a single human-trafficking arrest". In two whole years.
So, are you saying you are edit warring because my text said "No trafficking charges were raised against anyone." Well, replace "trafficking" with "human-trafficking" and then you are exactly as per your quote. XavierItzm (talk) 15:25, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Please read my entire post cause my point isn't about the day-spa investigation it is about how the section reads. The statement is about the day spa investigation, not the task force in its entirety. You can't talk about the task force, then mention the no charges came from day-spa investigation, but choose not to mention the day-spa investigation. I adding in the mention of the day-spa, and then made one revert, that is not editing warring. WikiVirusC^(talk) 15:31, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

• • I took the whole business out of the article. First because it was improperly referenced. A reference needs to say what is written in the sentence and the USA Today reference didn't. The Reason article made no mention of Aronberg at all. Saying indirectly or directly that Aronberg (or any living attorney) misprosecuted a case without references from a WP:RS is a WP:BLP violation. Write it properly with references to back it up and I have won't object to the Kraft business being back in the article....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:30, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
• This is a BLP about Aronberg. If this isn't even something he is personally involved with, why are we trying to insert it here? Yes, he formed the task force. That doesn't make his BLP the place for everything the task force did(n't) do. Bill Clinton put Florence Griffith Joyner on the President's Council on Physical Fitness. We don't shoe horn in her use of PED's into his BLP. Niteshift36 (talk) 13:21, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

  I don't care if it is inserted or not, but it was in article at the time so I was just trying to get it properly worded. It's out currently so my issue is moot right now, but if it goes back in my concerns in how it was worded before have been said. WikiVirusC^(talk) 15:01, 6 April 2021 (UTC)