Talk:Dario Cecchini

Latest comment: 7 months ago by CocoPazzo in topic Messed up in Editing References, Help Needed

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dario Cecchini. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:28, 6 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Messed up in Editing References, Help Needed edit

If you look at this page, you'll see that the REFERENCE section is currently blank, and the links that should be there are sitting at the bottom of the page. I have tried unsuccessfully to rectify the situation, and appeal for help.

I would also ask that you remove what seems to be footnote 6, which is not mentioned in the text, and does also appear in the EXTERNAL LINKS section, where it should be.

Thanks. CocoPazzo (talk) 13:45, 27 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

  • CocoPazzo, sorry, but I think you should stop editing the article. You don't know how the formatting works, you can't insert images properly, there's bold print and italics and indents all over the place, and your writing is both challenged and promotional. Drmies (talk) 21:26, 28 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
I see your numerous revisions and cryptic responses. Many of your remarks are not particularly helpful or instructive-- but I won't touch the page, even though I have questions.
For instance, you removed one section and ask, "Is this a quote?" when it was put in with quotation marks and the code indicates it is a Block Quote, then linked as a footnote in References.
As for Bold and Italics, if those are forbidden by wikipedia, however they are a Visual Editing style option?
I should also report that once I discovered Visual Editing, I used it exclusively for coding.
Also not sure why you removed all the External Credits. Most were links to videos, which demonstrate and show things mentioned in parts of the text.
Some of what you removed was there long before I started earlier this week.
No response needed. CocoPazzo (talk) 01:35, 29 September 2023 (UTC)Reply