This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Guitarists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Guitarists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GuitaristsWikipedia:WikiProject GuitaristsTemplate:WikiProject Guitaristsguitarist articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Country Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to country music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Country MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Country MusicTemplate:WikiProject Country MusicCountry Music articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
My correction of the VIAF has been reverted wirh the comment "The other was a different Dann Huff. The French source is wrong." But I dont believe that this, this and this entries (belonging to VIAF24794956) are incorrect. -- Jesi (talk) 17:06, 13 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
Yes, you are right, my comment "correction" was not correct, it should be "changing the VIAF". But your comment "The French source is wrong" was also not correct; so far I have no answer to my questions, if the VIAF-entries given above are right (I think, they are). Now we have to curious situation, that the VIAF-link in the article VIAF232935576 leads to en entry with only the Czech library, while more important libraries as the US-library of Congress, the French Library and the German National Library (including 40 publications of the person) – given by VIAF24794956 – are not available from the article. Normally in the article should be the "better" link. But obviously we are two different kinds of authors. So what. -- Jesi (talk) 13:03, 14 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
Since I don't understand your question I am unable to answer it. In short, fix VIAF, do not break the English Wikipedia. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:25, 14 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
