Talk:Daniel Weinreb

Various initial comments

I have added a list of external links to my published works, and added some text in order to help justify why I consider my works significant, in response to the comments about why this page was marked for speedy deletion. Thank you very much. DanielWeinreb (talk) 13:34, 21 November 2007 (UTC) DanielWeinreb

Well, disregarding the remarkable hubris of declaring yourself notable (someone once said, "if you have to tell people you're famous, you're not"), a brief glance at the history suggests that no one has ever marked this page for speedy deletion. Lordjeff06 (talk) 19:59, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Knock it off with the hubris stuff. Daniel Weinreb is perfectly notable; and he's referring to the AfD, not speedy. The distinction is often unclear to newbies. --Gwern (contribs) 22:11 21 November 2007 (GMT)

Look, I have no interest in getting into an argument, semantic or otherwise. If he meant the AFD, I apologize for what may have been seen as a condescending tone (although, not for nothing, but the AFD closed almost a month ago). For my part, I do not think he's particularly notable, but I'm content to defer to the AFD decision. I'd just point out that in the time that this article has existed, the only substantive edits have come from the article's subject. Everything else has been copy editing, formatting, or the addition/removal of tags. I can sympathize somewhat with band members or company owners fighting to claim recognition for their organizations, but an individual exhibiting such tenacity about his own importance is, if not evidence of hubris, at least... inelegant. Lordjeff06 (talk) 23:56, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

It closed on the 5th of November, t'day's the 21st. (A short month.) I haven't edited it because, a) in sum, the external links do a good job of covering the topic and b) I'm lazy. It may be inelegant, but it works. --Gwern (contribs) 02:07 22 November 2007 (GMT)

Sources

Would it be OK to remove the "This article does not cite any references or sources." notation, since I have added a bunch of them? Thank you. -- Daniel Weinreb —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.93.214.249 (talk) 11:45, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Daniel Weinreb. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091004183230/http://itasoftware.com/solutions/res.html to http://www.itasoftware.com/solutions/res.html
• Added archive https://archive.is/20120803063446/http://www.international-lisp-conference.org/2009/committee to http://www.international-lisp-conference.org/2009/committee
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/130000/125244/p50-lamb.pdf?key1=125244&key2=0873565911&coll=GUIDE&dl=GUIDE&CFID=44063141&CFTOKEN=24788318

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:32, 28 November 2017 (UTC)