Talk:Daniel McCaffery

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 16:34, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that Daniel McCaffery won the 2023 Pennsylvania Supreme Court election after pledging to protect the right to an abortion? Source: A Pennsylvania Supreme Court candidate who ran on abortion rights, Daniel McCaffery, also won
  • ALT1: ... that Daniel McCaffery supported abortion rights in the 2023 Pennsylvania Supreme Court election, even though judicial candidates typically avoid commenting on specific issues? Source: [1]
  • ALT2: ... that Daniel McCaffery campaigned on protecting abortion rights in the 2023 Pennsylvania Supreme Court election, even though judicial candidates typically avoid commenting on specific issues?
  • Reviewed:
  • Comment: This is my first DYK, so please excuse any errors in the nomination!

Created by HouseBlaster (talk). Self-nominated at 21:21, 12 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Daniel McCaffery; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

• Cited:
• Interesting: - Note: Main hook is a bit like a news item, but I find ALT1 interesting enough.

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Approved for ALT1. I would maybe change "supported" for "campaigned on" or "explicitly campaigned on". That has sourcing in the article to support. Up to you Acebulf ^{(talk | contribs)} 03:29, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

@Acebulf: Hi! Not really sure what the next steps are (again, first time doing this). I think I like the wording that Daniel McCaffery campaigned on protecting abortion rights in the 2023 Pennsylvania Supreme Court election, even though judicial candidates typically avoid commenting on specific issues?; thoughts on that version? HouseBlaster^talk 23:16, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

That wording is great! On the process, now that it's been approved someone will pick it up and place it in one of the staging areas, and then it will be on the front page. I don't know that either of us has anything left to do. Cheers! Acebulf ^{(talk | contribs)} 01:46, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Alright, I have added it as ALT2! HouseBlaster^talk 04:28, 19 November 2023 (UTC)