Talk:Daniel Bernard Roumain
 | Daniel Bernard Roumain received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
who wrote this? really. This article is an advertisement and should be rewritten to at least seem objective. I hope Roumain does not know of his article's existence; if so, my respect will wane. ridiculous.
I concur. How do we flag this as needing legitimate reference sources and a general look-over?
I met DBR back in 2017. I assure you, he 100% knows of this article's existence, evidenced by the fact that he encouraged us to look it up after his lecture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.31.57.156 (talk) 16:56, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Can this article be improved? edit
This musician is arguably quite notable as he has garnered a fair degree of publicity over the past few years and seems to be well-regarded as a rising star in classical music. This article should be brought up to the standards set by those on other classical and popular musicians.--Msr69er 04:10, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Daniel Bernard Roumain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120514212839/https://www.cuspconference.com/videos.php?section=Cusp-2009 to https://www.cuspconference.com/videos.php?section=Cusp-2009
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:13, 4 September 2017 (UTC)