Talk:Dan-el Padilla Peralta

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Kdammers in topic Race

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Dan-el Padilla Peralta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:57, 5 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Dan-el Padilla Peralta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:17, 3 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Racism? edit

Throwing around bogus accusations of racism at anyone whom you want to silence has become so popular that it seems improbable that the attacks on Mary Frances Williams are anything but bullying. Michael Hardy (talk) 05:05, 27 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

No one is trying to be silenced. The incident involving the subject of the page at the SCS in 2019 was added to the page as an important representation of events. That the incident was a racist attack is not in question. What can be questioned is the accusation that responding to the racist attack is a form of bullying, which is in contravention of Wikipedia's core content policy, a neutral point of view, that content must be represented fairly, proportionately and without bias. Srsval (talk) 13:34, 28 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Page needs re-writing= edit

I removed unsourced personal information about the subject's family members. The BLP guidance applies to them also.

I removed a section on the wider immigration picture (or whatever it was called) as this is not an article about immigration in the US.

The controversies section is bad and needs addressing. I am going to remove it in accordance with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Criticism

Description of events at SCS should be put in neutral terms and not be disproportionate. They are not the reason that the subject of this biography is notable.

Claire 75 (talk) 15:13, 27 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

New coverage of Padilla Peralta edit

Padilla Peralta is now the subject of a long profile in NYT magazine: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/02/magazine/classics-greece-rome-whiteness.html This material should be incorporated and the warning that Padilla Peralta does not meet the notability guidelines should be removed. 24.168.39.67 (talk) 12:54, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

In the US edit

I found the section on his being allowed to be in the US confusing. It seems to see that he cannot (legally) be in the US, but then it goes on to say that he was (thereafter) a scholar at various US schools. Unless it is just my obtuseness, can some-one re-write this section to make it clear? Kdammers (talk) 03:01, 18 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Race edit

Since a major reason for interest in Padilla is his antiracism, his race should be indicated. Kdammers (talk) 03:03, 18 March 2021 (UTC)Reply