Talk:Damien Pignolet

merger

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result was merge Bistro Moncur into Damien Pignolet as discussed below. -- Station1 (talk) 22:41, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

---

I suggest Bistro Moncur be merged with the article on the chef. Both articles are short. The chef's article mentions his book also and other restaurants. I believe Bistro Moncur and Pignolet are closely interwoven, ie anything said about the restaurant could equally be said in this article--Matilda ^talk 00:05, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Following a message left on the original editor of the restaurant article's talk page:

Hi the article survived deletion but I still think it would be better merged with an article on the chef - ie all content kept but appearing under the article on Pignolet and the article title would be a redirect to Pignolet. What do you think? Comments should be made at Talk:Damien Pignolet Regards --Matilda talk 00:10, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

I received the following reply:

What factors in to your decision to merge it with Damien and not Damien with it? Or merge it to Woolahra Hotel or vice versa? I need to see a line of logic. As for me I don't know what to do. Jason7825 (talk) 01:43, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

I am continuing the discussion here. As above, I believe Bistro Moncur and Pignolet are closely interwoven, ie anything said about the restaurant could equally be said in this article. This article has the greater capacity for expansion as there is more to be said about the chef than the restaurant. In the case of other Australian chef's of some notability we have articles on the chefs and not their restaurant, for example Neil Perry and not Rockpool.--Matilda ^talk 02:10, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Great line of logic, let's merge and redirect! Jason7825 (talk) 03:46, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Damien Pignolet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100723012524/http://www.smh.com.au:80/text/articles/2010/03/15/1268501430866.html to http://www.smh.com.au/text/articles/2010/03/15/1268501430866.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:58, 23 February 2016 (UTC)