This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Please do not use Wikipedia as a forum to provoke controversy about something that has not been reported as controversial in multiple reliable sources, especially when using that phony controversy to smear a person on their biography. This paragraph about the talk show is completely non-notable. The anon IP who keeps adding this -- who has been a serial vandalist from a couple of IPs in the Arlington VA area -- is distorting the WaPo article to make it sound like she was somehow a supporter of the talk show, when in fact the paper reported "Mogahed said she grew uncomfortable with the discussion and considered hanging up. "I didn't because I didn't want to create a story by doing anything dramatic. I just wanted to get through it and say what I could about my research like I had 100 times before and just never go on this show again."" I don't see any evidence that this incident of her being on the show is worth comment in an encyclopedia article. It certainly shouldn't be here phrased as if she were some kind of supporter of terrorism -- she works for Gallup; she wrote a book with John Esposito; it's downright hysterical to make such claims here, and totally inappropriate in an encyclopedia. csloat (talk) 08:11, 28 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
While we may argue on wording of this tweet controversy, it should not be completely removed from the article, since it was found remarkable on several servers around the world.--AsiBakshish 03:03, 19 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by AsiBakshish (talk • contribs)
It should be completely removed from the article until someone cites secondary sources that actually qualify as reliable sources suitable for a WP:BLP in Wikipedia. twitter.com is a primary source. www.wnd.com doesn't qualify. www.jihadwatch.org is a blog. www.israelnationalnews.com is an extremely partisan pro-settler source. If this event is notable and worthy of inclusion per WP:DUE, it should be easy for an editor who wants to include it to find it reported by mainstream reliable sources that they can cite. Until someone does that, it's gone. Sean.hoyland - talk 16:56, 1 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
Well, we probably agree she actually did tweet this. Do I understand you correctly, that it should not be part of the article, because it was not reported in the liberal media? --AsiBakshish 03:37, 11 April 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by AsiBakshish (talk • contribs)
