Talk:Dal segno

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Wahoofive in topic How the Sign Gets Its Look

Consequent edit

Dal segno is consequent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.106.185.109 (talk) 04:08, 6 October 2008‎

Above or below edit

Should it be indicated whether the sign and text should be placed above or under the staff? Which is more common? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.37.120.20 (talk) 18:43, 2 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Additional citations edit

Why and where does this article need additional citations for verification? What references does it need and how should they be added? Hyacinth (talk) 22:52, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Error in MIDI file edit

"A contrived example showing DS al FINE." The MIDI file is wrong while the description is correct. --SamInside (talk) 10:35, 29 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

I was taught that a repeated section (a section marked by standard repeat bars) that occurs in a section repeated when taking a Da Capo or a Dal Segno should not be repeated unless otherwise marked. Apparently this convention is not universal however: https://www.ars-nova.com/Theory%20Q&A/Q109.html 2001:569:F8DC:3C00:F547:968F:78A7:E64A (talk) 19:29, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Origin of symbol edit

Is there any known history of the segno symbol itself, such as the earliest known use or the basis for its graphical design? DMacks (talk) 04:26, 1 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

[Untitled] edit

Da capo and Dal Segno have the same purpose in repeating the sections except in the exact places where to begin. Is the statement true? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.176.4.209 (talk)

How the Sign Gets Its Look edit

According to the following link, the musical sign is supposed to be a combination of a slanted repeat symbol (which means repeat the previous measure) and the letter “S” (which probably stands for “Segno”). https://www.musicreadingsavant.com/dal-segno-sign/ Cbsteffen (talk) 03:18, 16 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

That website strikes me as not a reliable source. —Wahoofive (talk) 02:54, 3 January 2023 (UTC)Reply