Talk:Dak-galbi

Romanization

Why was "dak" changed to "dalk" in this edit? Please see Wiktionary entry at http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%EB%8B%AD for romanizations. Badagnani (talk) 00:31, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Move proposal

• Move to Dak galbi. According to Wiktionary, the first word does not contain an L in Revised Romanization (which we generally use for Wikipedia titles). Badagnani (talk) 00:35, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

  According to Korean wikionary, the current title is correct.--Caspian blue (talk) 00:36, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

• Comment - Please see Wiktionary entry at http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%EB%8B%AD and Hangul syllabic blocks at http://wikisource.org/wiki/List_of_Hangul_syllables. Badagnani (talk) 00:45, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

So what? There is no Romanization for "닭" or "ㄺ". The attached source do not have anything pertinent to them.(the sources are dead except one) Korean Wikitory is considered more accurate than English Wikitory by Korean editors when it comes to Korean language. --Caspian blue (talk) 00:50, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

• Comment - We use Revised Romanization at Wikipedia, and sources have been provided showing that "dak" and "tak" are the romanizations in Revised Romanization and M-R, respectively. Badagnani (talk) 00:57, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

• Comment - You're being very disruptive and stubborn not to listen to my opinion at all. Look at this in which 닭 is spelled Dalk" in the Revised Romanization? http://ko.wiktionary.org/wiki/%EB%8B%AD --Caspian blue (talk) 01:02, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

• Comment - I have provided two sources showing "dak"/"tak", and you one showing "dalk"/"talk." In either case, the repeated removal of the tags requesting that these romanizations be verified was highly inappropriate. Badagnani (talk) 01:05, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

• Comment - Your one source does not show anything related to dak/tak. Your behaviors here and on Andong jjimdalk are nothing but highly disruptive. You're the one who commits such absolutely unhelpful behaviors as usual. I asked help from expert, so will see.--Caspian blue (talk) 01:20, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

• Comment - Would you kindly moderate your tone? The two sources are http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%EB%8B%AD and http://wikisource.org/wiki/List_of_Hangul_syllables . In the first link, it's necessary to click on the gray box on the right that says "Romanization to see the romanizations. Badagnani (talk) 01:29, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

• Comment - Regarding the RR and M-R romanizations, we use RR and M-R, not ad hoc, literal romanizations that represent formerly pronounced phonemes not used in modern pronunciation. Sources for these are provided above. Badagnani (talk) 01:31, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

You're proven that you do not try to listen to others opinion at all. The wikisource is useless as long as it is not sourced. I said I checked the references attached on the page in which has no Romanization for "닭" "ㄺ" You are the one who initiated to accuse me. Bear out the valid criticism, then you will grow. --Caspian blue (talk) 01:38, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

• Comment - Certainly I am listening and reading others' opinions and sources. If you were correct, why did you just move the page to the romanization I suggested, from the two sources I presented? Badagnani (talk) 02:21, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

• You did not listen to my comment at all, and you know that. I only confirm the knowledge by the two experts on linguistic, not you. Honestly, given your wrong info on the etymology of Samgyetang, you lost your credibility on such cases. I only follow Kjoonlee and Kwami's advices, not you. You must not be confused. Unless I asked them for help, I doubt that you would try to do anything to resolve. I'm listening to reasonable people's comment only.--Caspian blue (talk) 02:28, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

• Comment - Sorry, your comment doesn't make sense. Can you use this page for its intended purpose: to propose improvements or modifications to this article? Badagnani (talk) 03:46, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
• Comment - Mr. Badagnani, don't make such nonsense further. I resolved this dispute with the help by the two experts only and you still followed me. You only increased and expanded your problems with your communication skill. I use this page for its intended purpose, that's why Kwami came to here to help. Your rationale was only "According to English Wiktionary" (which is absolutely unsourced and unreliable). You have a history of introducing false info as referring to the Wiktionary. There is no logic existing in your statements and you can't explain why the unsourced entry should be spelled "dak/tak". --Caspian blue (talk) 11:20, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Caspian blue asks me to moderate here. I have to say I agree with Badagnani. The official transliteration system promulgated by the government of South Korea spells the syllable 닭 dalg- before a vowel, as in 닭고기 dalgogi, but dak before a consonant or at the end of a word. (I haven't seen this particular syllable, but that's the pattern over all. Please correct me if anyone finds an exception.) Personally, I agree with Caspian blue as to what it should be—I quite dislike the new orthography, with only Wade-Giles being worse,—but as an editor I am unfortunately constrained by what things are, and what they are is dak. kwami (talk) 01:56, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Galbi Reference

I'm taking this out because it's misleading. Rbritt518 (talk) 02:06, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Way off topic. As a westerner in Korea, I loved this dish. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.233.249.22 (talk) 15:24, 12 October 2011 (UTC)