Talk:DJMax Portable Black Square

Translation notes

More or less a direct translation from http://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EB%94%94%EC%A0%9C%EC%9D%B4%EB%A7%A5%EC%8A%A4_%ED%8F%AC%ED%84%B0%EB%B8%94_%EB%B8%94%EB%9E%99_%EC%8A%A4%ED%80%98%EC%96%B4 please check if you can. Prerelease dates taken from djmax.co.kr, main release date taken from http://psp.cngba.com/djmax/ and http://psp.cngba.com/psp_fs/2008121158724.shtml -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs 01:03, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

About bugs

Clarification is required on what exactly the Link Disc bug is, or whether the LINK Patch Package was merely a "Data Install" so that players would not have to wait 2~3 minutes when linking to Clazziquai Edition for the first time. --INFERTakuya (talk) 11:28, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

well glitches section should have a more general name, probably history, or something like that. but it seems these things don't always get fixed or mentioned. so if there isn't any verification through a reliable source, then we should remove it, even if it is true. As for the rest, also needs ore generalization and explain in a neutral point of view.Bread Ninja (talk) 01:14, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

There are Korean language "what's changed with this patch" readme files available... or at least were available in internet. If somebody knows Korean language well and if they can seek those files then building better section would be no issue. --Mikitei (talk) 15:09, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

About the title

Bread Ninja, are you sure there are colon in the title? Can you show some proof of that? --Mikitei (talk) 18:07, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

technically it's a "-" instead of a "colon" but often simplified to a colon for various reasons. If you like to add the dash instead. that would be fine, or if you want to revert it back, get a moderator to do it.Bread Ninja (talk) 18:11, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Heres the info i found. [1], [2], and [3].Bread Ninja (talk) 18:15, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

In actual package and game manual there ain't colon in the title. Korean Wiki page doesn't have it in the title. IGN site didn't have it. They had "...Portable -- Black...", Gamefaqs is user written and they had "...Portable - Black...", GameSpy belongs to IGN and their site is a mirror of IGN's information so it says "...Portable -- Black..."... I'll revert your change... or do you want to do it yourself? --Mikitei (talk) 19:13, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

It's difficult to revert a move, so i'l find a moderator.Bread Ninja (talk) 19:25, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you. --Mikitei (talk) 19:37, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

In the end I had to ask admin to do it. Well it's done now Bread Ninja. You don't have to take care of it anymore. Moments like these really make me want to believe that working with you is possible. :) --Mikitei (talk) 08:59, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Maybe when i tell you you're bias, you should at least consider the idea that you are instead of using "I'm rubber you're glue" tactics. if you want this to work stop assuming i'm doing things halfway and one sided (one-sided on what exactly? at least i mentionthe exact type of bias that i accuse you of). 2) this isn't a forum, just because there's an argument does not mean someone is trolling you, and you shouldn't react to it, especially if nothing they say is wrong. 3) actually try to make a change in someones POV, you can't repeat the same thing over and over and expect different results.I do it, but only because it's being ignored.Bread Ninja (talk) 10:46, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Sections

Bread Ninja, there aren't enough information from normal edition release. Just moving one sentence from summary to a limited edition section and then calling it "releases" won't cut it. It should have two clearly separate sections and text about multiple releases but since this game only had one normal release and one collector's edition it isn't a good thing and only makes article complex. If you have absolute need to have section about "release" which is generally a collection of viewpoints around (including but not limited to) what kind of events lead to the release of the game and what kind of packages where released then write like you suggested a "releases" section under which has "normal edition" and "limited edition" subsections. However "releases" section which is only about limited edition is not a good thing. But I don't see much point in doing that... If we have more disagreements like this we should come to this talk page and write about them... I wrote this msg in a hurry. Oh and before I go... that sentence which states that Black Square release was postponed might be partially false information. I've come to understand that because Clazziquai edition was leaked to internet download sites even before the actual release was the main reason for them to move release date to further on so that Pentavision could develop the product key system they currently have in korean DJMAX games as a method for preventing non-licensed copies from submitting scores to ranking site and preventing access for some specials and extras which legally purchased copy would have. --Mikitei (talk) 05:56, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Let me also add that the information I wrote to limited edition section is specifically about limited edition. You're probably misunderstanding something if you think it's general information about the releasing of the game. --Mikitei (talk) 06:04, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

there really isn't any difference between a release of a normal and limited edition. the special edition mentions nothing more than it exist and that it's release date. if you don't like "limited edition" than maybe "versions and merchandise" is best suited as Kingdom Hearts (video game) a (featured article) has. But the only difference between that one and this one is they have more merchandise and versions, so that would mean no subsection.

you might have added information to add more to that section but that isn't the point to renaming the section. the idea of renaming sections isn't meant for each specific topic. think about that a lil more. If two things have in common, then you can merge that information together.Bread Ninja (talk) 06:11, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

File:DJMax Portable Black Square Limited Edition Package contents.JPG Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:DJMax Portable Black Square Limited Edition Package contents.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:DJMax Portable Black Square Limited Edition Package contents.JPG) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:48, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on DJMax Portable Black Square. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722134414/http://ruliweb.daum.net/data/rulinews/read.htm?num=16637 to http://ruliweb.daum.net/data/rulinews/read.htm?num=16637

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on DJMax Portable Black Square. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070817012739/http://www.djmax.co.kr/ to http://www.djmax.co.kr/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150203054029/http://www.pentavision.co.kr/ to http://www.pentavision.co.kr/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:28, 2 September 2017 (UTC)