 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Sources edit
There are few sources now in the article which are not (a) arXiv papers, (b) blog entries, or (c) press releases (whether or not reprinted in reliable sources). [no, I couldn't find a phrase for "press releases" beginning with "c".] In fact, D-Wave One was now found to have had 8 qbits, rather than 128 advertised in this article, whatever the source. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 02:16, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
- I am currently working through the article to remove bad sources and do general clean-up. The D-Wave One did have approximately 128 qubits, though. This is shown by reliable sources such as this Nature paper here. -Strongguy1 (talk) 15:50, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
- I now believe all sources to be reliable in this article. All sources are academic papers, official blogs, legitimate news sites, or legitimate company websites. Thus, I am removing the "unreliable sources" tag. If someone would like to dispute this then please let me know. --Strongguy1 (talk) 21:09, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Neutrality edit
Curious about the neutrality tag added here. Could someone provide an argument as to whether this article is biased for or against D-Wave? Otherwise I think we need to discuss removing this tag. --Strongguy1 (talk) 18:49, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- I have heard nothing from anyone here supporting the neutrality tag being up. I will continue to refine this article, but for now I am taking the tag down. Any dissent is welcome. ~ Strongguy1 (talk) 15:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)