Talk:Düm Tek Tek

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move the page since there was no disagreement in the first place. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 19:06, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

---

Düm Tek Tek (Hadise song) → Düm Tek Tek — There is only one song called Düm Tek Tek. (Hadise song) statement is unnecessary. — Turkish Flame ^☎ 16:16, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

• Support--Turkish Flame ^☎ 16:16, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
• Support I told you I was taking care of it, this is all unnecessary, there is no one protesting the move. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 16:38, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
• Support The brackets section is totally unneeded. -- [[ axg ⁞⁞ talk ]] 17:01, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
• Support--Triancula (talk) 17:32, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Discussion

Any additional comments:

The title of the page is inappropriate. It should be Düm Tek Tek. Because there is only one song called Düm Tek Tek. (Hadise song) statement is unnecessary. Also Düm Tek Tek is the correct name of the song. Crazy for You, Living With Dreams and others are incorrect [1]. We have to reach a consensus then we'll request for move. Please express your opinions. Thanks! --Turkish Flame ^☎ 17:51, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

There is no real need for all of this. Now that the official title has been announced there is no need for any discussion. I'm working on moving it to a name without "Hadise song" its only there because people felt the need to move the page every two seconds and locked the name "Dum Tek Tek". DO NOT do a copy paste please. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 18:03, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

We don't have to work on moving the name. EdJohnston said "You have to reach a consensus. After consensus is reached, ask me again to change the name." Let's find someone else. --Turkish Flame ^☎ 18:14, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

He doesn't know the situation, I'm working on it. There is no consensus to be reached. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 18:17, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Edit

I've edited the article. Because as the linked newspaper article also says, the most watched show that night was the Turkish version of Deal or No Deal.--Sakrileg (talk) 22:01, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Oops, I reverted before I saw this, please provide an edit summary next time. You say it "also says" so are you saying that it says that about Deal or No Deal in addition to Hadise? Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 23:22, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

The article says that Deal or No Deal was the most watched show that night. It only says Hadise's shows ratings are really anticipated by public. So this statement is not true.--Sakrileg (talk) 10:56, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Charts

"Düm Tek Tek" wasn't even charted on Turkey Top 20 Chart. So I'll delete this information and charts section aswell, since it wasn't charted on any official chart yet.--Sakrileg (talk) 19:09, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Theme of the song?

Does anyone know what sort of theme this song has to it? I myself consider it a sort of love song, due to the lyrical content. Anyone agree?Visokor (talk) 16:10, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://www.belgovision.com/en/index_f.php?id=5271

  Triggered by \bbelgovision\.com\b on the local blacklist

• http://www.belgovision.com/en/index_f.php?id=5377

  Triggered by \bbelgovision\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 19:40, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Düm Tek Tek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5saFK6921?url=http://www.billboard-japan.com/system/jp_charts/hot100/11-50/ to http://www.billboard-japan.com/system/jp_charts/hot100/11-50/
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5vAE6cM1l?url=http://www.billboard-japan.com/system/jp_charts/adult_airplay/11-50/ to http://www.billboard-japan.com/system/jp_charts/adult_airplay/11-50/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110603121626/http://www.hayatadair.info:80/number-one-top-20/ to http://www.hayatadair.info/number-one-top-20/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:24, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Düm Tek Tek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101213194321/http://www.billboard-japan.com/system/jp_charts/top_airplay/11-50 to http://www.billboard-japan.com/system/jp_charts/top_airplay/11-50/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:36, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Düm Tek Tek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/66NEoDBMy?url=http://www.esctoday.com/news/read/12646 to http://www.esctoday.com/news/read/12646
• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/66NEmz5cw?url=http://esctoday.com/news/read/12818 to http://esctoday.com/news/read/12818

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:28, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Monthly top 20

Has anyone considered adding that the song has consistently appeared in the official Eurovision YT channel's "Top 20" videos? Visokor (talk) 19:04, 24 November 2022 (UTC)