 | A fact from Cyclone Anita appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 April 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Todo edit
Finish the meteorological history, and this sentence is unsourced:
- However, the precursor to the cyclone caused more substantial damage. Torrential rainfall and severe weather damaged numerous homes in Rio Grande do Sul. Several tornadoes also touched down between March 5 and 7. Despite the damage, there were no reports of fatalities in relation to the cyclone
All in all, nicely done. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:23, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
- The MH should be finished ASAP, if possible. Juliancolton | Talk 14:45, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Merge? edit
The storm isn't as rare as we thought they once were. Most of the article is just MH. My biggest qualm is that the title isn't really that well-known. A Google search doesn't indicate any reliable sources. There also aren't any post-storm sources mentioning the storm, unlike Catarina which still gets coverage. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:56, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
I disagree, Antia is still one of a kind, of one only of three confirmed storms in the SATL. This storms passes WP:N and also affected land. IMO, it should stay.I am not supporter/opposing this merger, but if this ke article is kept, it will need tom be re-titled IMO. YE Tropical Cyclone 01:07, 1 June 2011 (UTC)