Talk:Cybistrini
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Klbrain in topic Proposed merge of Cybistrinae with Cybistrini
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The contents of the Cybistrinae page were merged into Cybistrini on 1 October 2022. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
This article was created by the bot Qbugbot. For more information, see User:Qbugbot/info. For questions and comments, leave a message at User:Qbugbot/talk.
Proposed merge of Cybistrinae with Cybistrini edit
These seven genera have been treated by some sources as a subfamily within Dytiscidae and by others as a tribe within Dytiscinae, We don't need two articles. William Avery (talk) 08:51, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- Agree with merge. There is only one tribe in Cybistrinae, and it is widely accepted as distinct from Dytiscinae. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 11:31, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
